After almost a year of public back and forth, Apple and Epic Games will head to court on Monday to discuss if the App Store and its in-app purchase policies violate antitrust law. Here’s what you need to know.

In August 2020, Epic decided to give Fortnite players a discount if they bought items using a purchase mechanism that circumvented the App Store, which broke Apple rules. After the Cupertino company removed the game from the App Store, Epic was ready to sue Apple on the same day. Here’s what the Fortnite-maker had to say at the time:

Back then, Apple released a statement about this lawsuit:

“This case concerns Apple’s use of a series of anti-competitive restraints and monopolistic practices in markets for the distribution of software applications to users of mobile computing devices like smartphones and tablets, and the processing of consumers’ payments for digital content used within iOS mobile apps. Apple imposes unreasonable and unlawful restraints to completely monopolize both markets and prevent software developers from reaching the over one billion users of its mobile devices unless they go through a single store controlled by Apple, the App Store, where Apple exacts an oppressive 30% tax on the sale of every app.“

Since then, both companies started preparing for this trial, which will start this Monday and will take three weeks to come to an end.

“Epic has had apps on the App Store for a decade and has benefited from the App Store ecosystem – including its tools, testing, and distribution that Apple provides to all developers. Epic agreed to the App Store terms and guidelines freely and we’re glad they’ve built such a successful business on the App Store. The fact that their business interests now lead them to push for a special arrangement does not change the fact that these guidelines create a level playing field for all developers and make the store safe for all users. We will make every effort to work with Epic to resolve these violations so they can return Fortnite to the App Store.“

What Epic wants vs what Apple wants

Epic Games wants to sell its Fornite items to iOS users without paying the 30% cut, as well as be able to operate its own app store for the Apple ecosystem. If Epic wins the court trial, it would establish the App Store as a monopoly and Apple could have to reduce its commissions or open up the iPhone to side-loaded apps or even alternative app stores.

Apple, on the other hand, wants to prove that the App Store is “necessary and inseparable component” of the entire iOS experience. This means: without the app review process and lack of control of which app users can download, the iPhone would be a fundamentally different device and, according to Apple, a worse one.

If Apple wins this case, it will be way difficult for Epic and other companies to come after Apple on similar grounds.

How the trial works

Epic vs Apple battle will start this Monday. Each side will have 45 hours to present its case. The District Judge for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will be the one overseeing the case and will also preside the trial.

The trial will be held in person and a few witnesses will testify over Zoom. The biggest question for this case will not be about app stores or Fortnite, but about how to define a monopoly.

There are the key characters for Epic:

  • Tim Sweeney, co-founder and CEO
  • Mark Rein, co-founder and VP of business development
  • Daniel Vogel, chief operating officer
  • Steve Alisson, Epic Games Store general manager
  • Andrew Grant, engineering fellow
  • Matthew Weissinger, VP of marketing
  • Thomas Ko, senior director and head of online business strategy and operations

These are the key characters for Apple:

  • Tim Cook, CEO
  • Eddy Cue, senior VP of internet software and services
  • Craig Federighi, senior VP of software engineering
  • Phill Schiller, Apple fellow and former marketing chief
  • Matt Fischer, App Store VP
  • Eric Gray, director of commerce and payments
  • Trystan Kosmynka, senior director of marketing
  • Scott Forstall, former senior VP of iOS software
  • Phillipe Shoemaker, former technology director for App Store review

Third-party witnesses

  • Lori Wright, Microsoft’s VP of Xbox business development
  • Benjamin Simon, Yoga Buddha Co. founder and CEO
  • Aashish Patel, Nvidia’s director of product management
  • Adrian Ong, Match Group senior VP of operations
  • Shelley Gould, SmartStops co-founder and presidente
  • Epic building team of App Store antagonists in monopoly case against Apple after Fortnite protest
  • Epic likely to be asked two hard questions by Apple’s lawyers
  • Developers highlight more anomalies in Apple’s 30% cut
  • Epic Games lawsuit is just a publicity stunt, says Apple
  • Epic, Spotify, Tile and more form Coalition for App Fairness
  • Apple responds to antitrust pressure with App Store PR blitz
  • Ex-Apple App Store head says company uses rules ‘as a weapon against competitors’
  • Epic claims App Store contract illegal; Facebook Gaming says Apple ‘frustrating’
  • North Dakota senate votes down anti-App Store bill first given to lawmaker by Coalition for App Fairness lobbyist
  • Apple defends app review process following formal complaints by Epic and others
  • Apple claims iOS developers can bypass the App Store by creating web apps
  • Epic files UK antitrust complaint against Apple after losing legal battle
  • Epic v. Apple discovery details ‘Project Liberty’ scheme to skirt App Store with Fortnite
  • Apple reinforces that App Store was built to protect users as trial against Epic approaches
  • Epic Games lawsuit: Academics from Harvard, Stanford, UCL, and more testify against Apple
  • iOS accounted for just 7% of Fortnite revenue for Epic Games, court documents reveal